Skip to the main content.
Contact Us Sign In
Contact Us Sign In

Onsi University

Discover our wide range of courses designed to help you maintain compliance with Prevailing Wage and other labor laws.

Events

Join our upcoming events to ensure seamless compliance with Prevailing Wage and other essential labor laws.

Services

Discover how our services can assist you and your company in staying compliant with Prevailing Wage.

Resources

Explore the resources we offer, providing quick guidance on a wide range of topics.

2 min read

Decoding Debarment: Understanding the Process for Federal Contractors

Decoding Debarment: Understanding the Process for Federal Contractors

Navigating Debarment: An Insight into Debarment for Federal Contractors

For government contractors, adherence to federal wage laws is crucial to ensure their employees receive the prevailing wage compensation and required Bonafide fringe benefits to which they are entitled, lest a complaint be filed and the find themselves on the wrong end of a DOL Investigation. The U.S. Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division takes swift action when contractors violate these laws. This blog examines a recent case involving Perkins Management Services Co. and sheds light on the decision-making process leading to contractor debarment. Furthermore, it offers valuable insights on how government contractors can avoid similar predicaments.

Case Study

Perkins Management Services Co. In April 2017, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency awarded Perkins Management Services Co. a contract to provide food service staffing at the agency's cafeteria in Durham, North Carolina. However, an investigation conducted in 2021 exposed several violations, prompting an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to issue a debarment order against Perkins Management Services Co. This order barred the contractor from bidding on federal contracts for three years due to their failure to comply with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, as well as and the Service Contract Act.

 

Understanding Debarment Criteria

 Section 5(a) of the Service Contract Act (SCA) specifies that any person or firm found to have violated the act, as determined by an ALJ hearing, is subject to debarment, unless "unusual circumstances" warrant an alternative recommendation from the Secretary of Labor. While the term "unusual circumstances" lacks a clear definition from Congress, ALJs have established its meaning and intent through their decisions.

The following criteria are evaluated by investigators to issue their debarment recommendation:

  1. Refusal to comply with the law.
  2. Refusal to pay back wages.
  3. Significant amount of SCA back wages with no justifiable excuse for the violations.
  4. History of labor standards violations, including "recordkeeping-only" violations.

 

Perkins Management Services Co.'s Violations

Investigations revealed multiple violations committed by Perkins Management Services Co. The company paid two cooks an hourly wage lower than the prevailing wage rates required for their occupations. Additionally, during the initial months of the contract, the employer failed to provide the cooks with required fringe benefits. Other violations included the failure to provide paid vacation to eligible workers and the payment of overtime rates lower than those legally mandated.

 

Justification for Debarment

 The Administrative Law Judge likely based the decision to debar Perkins Management Services Co. on the concept of "willfulness" as defined by the Department of Labor (DOL). Willfulness encompasses the nature, extent, and seriousness of past violations. Determining willfulness involves factors such as falsification or concealment of records, deliberate violations (such as disregarding wage determination rates and fringe benefits), intentional employee misclassification, and incorrect records. While specific details regarding the company's recordkeeping are not publicly available, it is likely that inadequate and inaccurate records played a part in the debarment decision.

 

Importance of SCA Compliance

The resolution of wage violations through the payment of back wages, as evidenced by Perkins Management Services Co.'s case, is not sufficient to secure debarment relief. Government contractors must constantly monitor SCA compliance policies, as noncompliance can have severe repercussions for their businesses. The Department of Labor has demonstrated its firm stance on contractor violations, leaving little room for leniency.

 

Ensuring Compliance

Onsi's Offerings: To navigate the complexities of SCA compliance effectively, Onsi provides a range of Educational Training Courses designed specifically for government contractors. These courses offer comprehensive insights into SCA compliance, ensuring contractors understand the intricacies of the regulations. In addition, Onsi offers Fringe Benefit Tracking Services, Compliance Auditing, and Consulting Services to assist businesses in maintaining compliance and reducing exposure.

If SCA compliance is giving your team a perpetual headache, email trust@onsigroup.com for further guidance.

 

- Aaron Ramos, Labor Compliance Officer

What is a Conformance and When Should It Be Used?

What is a Conformance and When Should It Be Used?

Understanding the Conformance Process Any contractor who has contracts subject to the Service Contracts Act of 1965 is familiar with the term...

Read More
E.O. 14055: Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts

E.O. 14055: Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts

On December 13th, 2023, the Department of Labor announced their long-awaitedFinal Ruleoutlining the requirements of Executive Order 14055...

Read More
Finding The Balance: Navigating WD in 10-Year Service Contracts

Finding The Balance: Navigating WD in 10-Year Service Contracts

10 Year Contracts and Wage Determinations Over the last few years, Government Contractors have seen the rise of a new trend: 10-year Service...

Read More